Advertisement

STEORN DEMO LIVE & STREAM

Not rated 22,394

#coil #positioning #replication #experimental #STEORN #demo #electromagnetic #precision #failure analysis #verification
STEORN DEMO LIVE & STREAM
STEORN DEMO LIVE & STREAM

Description: The positioning of a coil by even a millimeter can significantly impact the success or failure of a project. When there are tens of millimeters of possible positions, the likelihood of incorrect placement—and thus failure—greatly increases. This situation necessitates an exact replication for operational verification before any creative modifications can be made. However, there is a notable challenge regarding exact replication due to a lack of information. Critical details such as the core material, the number of turns, the polarity of the magnets, the current draw, the gap between the magnets and coils, and even confirmation of operational effectiveness after replication are all unknown. Additionally, it remains unclear if the testing device, which features horizontal coils, demonstrates the same coefficient of performance greater than one as the alternative design. There is also no available scope shot for an Orbo device with vertical coils, as no tests have been shown for that configuration beyond mere observation of its spinning motion. The uncertainty extends to magnet strength, as the magnets tested for strength were not part of the original demonstrations but were instead used in a demonstration intended to showcase inductance changes. Consequently, creating an exact replica is impossible without further information. While it is feasible to construct a device resembling an Orbo and exhibiting similar behaviors, any success achieved accidentally would not confirm its authenticity, as it could simply be a collection of assumptions that fortuitously functions. This has led many individuals to focus on replicating the "effect" of the Orbo rather than the device itself, given the limited information available. Despite divergent approaches, the search for free energy remains a challenging endeavor fraught with difficulties. It is essential to recognize that the choice of a 10 amp-hour battery does not necessarily indicate high current usage; it may have been chosen for its capacity to power the Orbo for extended periods, regardless of whether it charges as intended. This decision likely stems from the desire to avoid a repeat of the previous public scrutiny faced by Steorn, which may have influenced their strategy to prevent showcasing a motor that could fail after only an hour of operation. The lack of posting about personal replications can be attributed to various reasons, including equipment failure and the absence of significant results. Current replication efforts are ongoing, focusing on achieving an accurate representation of the Orbo, particularly with a dual magnet configuration and vertical toroidal coils.

The electronic schematic for replicating the Orbo device should consider several critical parameters to ensure operational integrity. The coil arrangement, core material, and number of turns are paramount in achieving the desired inductive properties. The use of toroidal cores is recommended to minimize magnetic flux leakage and enhance efficiency. The coils should be wound with a specific gauge of wire to optimize current handling while balancing resistance and inductance.

In terms of magnet selection, high-energy neodymium magnets are advisable due to their superior strength and stability. The orientation of the magnets in relation to the coils must adhere to the specified polarity to ensure optimal magnetic coupling. The spacing between the magnets and coils should be adjustable, allowing for fine-tuning of the magnetic field interaction, which is critical for achieving the desired performance metrics.

Furthermore, the power supply must be capable of delivering the necessary current without overheating or causing voltage drops. A regulated power source with a current monitoring feature can provide insights into the operational parameters and assist in troubleshooting any issues that arise during testing.

To validate the performance of the constructed device, it is essential to incorporate measurement tools such as oscilloscopes to monitor voltage and current waveforms. This data will help ascertain whether the device achieves a coefficient of performance greater than one and will provide insights into the efficiency of the energy conversion process.

In summary, the replication of the Orbo device requires meticulous attention to detail in coil construction, magnet selection, and overall circuit design. By adhering to these guidelines and systematically testing each component, it is possible to advance the understanding of the Orbo's operational principles and potentially contribute to the broader pursuit of free energy technologies.It should be painfully obvious that the positioning of a coil by a millimeter one way or the other could decide success or failure. and when you`ve got 10s of millimeters as a possible position, the chances for INCORRECT positioning, and thus FAILURE, are far greater than getting it right.

This begs an exact replication first to verify operation, and then you can `get creatve`. But there is a little problem with an EXACT replication. There is NO FRIGGIN INFO! STEORN, come on now, throw us a bone here. We do not know the core material for sure, the number of turns, the polarity of the magnets, the current draw, the gap between the magnets and coils, and we do not even know for sure if it works even after we get a PERFECT replication. We also have not been told whether or not the device they use for testing, with the coils laid horizontal, even shows the same COP>1 than the other design.

We also do not know what the scope shot looks like on an orbo with vertical coils, because they have neglected to show any tests at all with that version except let us watch it spin. Since we do not know if the horizontal core device shows OU, we are guessing on magnet strength also.

The magnets they tested the strength of, were not even part of either of their original demo`s. They were part of a demo built to show the inductance change. Therefore, it is IMPOSSIBLE to make an exact replication without some info. We can make a device that looks like an orbo, and acts like an orbo. but even if we got it right on accident, we wouldn`t even know if it was an orbo, or a crap load of assumptions thrown into a big pile that happened to work. But, we keep trying anyway. And that leaves most of us simply trying to replicate the orbo "effect", instead of replicating the orbo itself.

Because it`s the only thing we really seem to have info on. So even though everyone is drifting different directions, I can`t really blame them. Well, don`t count us all out yet. And yes, some of us have been watching every single theory that has been popped out here. Just because we don`t all reply to it, does not mean we are ignoring it. Trust me, I`ve been following all your comments, and trying to learn more about each effect, and move along as best I can. Keep it coming, just don`t get to frustrated. The search for free energy is not an easy one without headaches. I don`t like siding with people who seem to just argue about everything, but I must say, just because they used a 10 amp hr battery, does not mean they are using that much current at all.

For all we know, they are using 5ma of current, and just simply wanted a battery that could run their orbo for days easily if it did not charge as planned. You must realize, after the public humiliation Steorn went through last time, I`m quite sure they were planning on avoiding showing a motor that died after 1 hour of operation if it did not work as planned.

I personally think the 10 amp hr battery was just a form of insurance for them. I have not posted much about my replications, for a couple reasons. My digital camcorder shot craps so have not been able to shoot video, although I think I found a camera that will work okay now. Also, my replications have quite frankly not shown anything different than the others yet, so nothing good to post about them.

My current replication is not done yet but is as exact as I am able to do so far to replicating Orbo. Here`s a couple photo`s just to show I am working on the dual magnet version and the vertical toroidal coils.

It`s obviously not done yet, and I do not even have the uprights attached yet or all the magnets installed. But I just wanted to show the direction my replication is taking. Hopefully I will at least get enough time to get

Related Circuits